What are some in-depth feedbacks you can give for my response to the question I answered below?

This week we reviewed the role of long-term strategy and priorities for homeland security. Is the current organizational structure and strategy for DHS adequate to meet the broader range of challenges and threats over the next decade?

Adapting an approach to DHS strategies and priorities for homeland security is a complex and time-sensitive task. The current organizational structure and strategy are not going to be able to address and combat the developing issues, such as cyberattacks, non-military threats like disinformation campaigns, and election interference. According to the National Intelligence Strategy (NIS) 2019 of the domestic and global environment now hold the same weight, meaning that 21st century challenges, emerging threats, and opportunities to augment defensive tactics, DHS will need to expand coordinating equities of the IC and integration processes that best effect and value the mission (NIS, 2019). Additionally, leveraging partnership with government and private sector entities, and a stronger push of transparency of intelligence and communication between partners will bolster the defense posture for emerging threats and broader challenges. In 2002, DHS strategic objectives consisted of preventing terrorist attacks against the U.S., reducing America's vulnerability to terrorism, and minimized the damage and recovery from attacks that may occur (DHS, 2002). This a great example of the DHS's vision and having one type of threat created from the unfortunate events from the year prior to this strategy coming out; DHS was not thinking of the broader range of challenges that would affect the U.S.

Threats and vulnerabilities have been identified in the last decade, and with the IC joining forces to better prepare, prevent, and action elements, this restructures equal focal points to these emerging threats, integrating security and counterintelligence against adversaries. New research is showing that there is a mismatched element to the DHS's perception and reality when it comes to the DHS I&A; the past 18 years they have attempted to reform and refocus to protect the U.S. but have been blindsided by other assaulting efforts, like Russian disinformation campaigns and election interferences (Beckner, C., 2021). Two priorities that would assist DHS with the next decade of expanded ranges of threats is establishing new collection authorities for the IC and spreading the wealth of all-source analysis for executive level stakeholders (Beckner, C., 2021). Examples of advantages from these priorities being met in the next decade will be found within the operational components of IC organizations and private sector partners, which will consist of planning for contingent, cyberspace, emerging, global, and domestic threats. Strategic responses will be labeled as reactionary, while threat and vulnerability based decisions will continue to augment the fusion cells and coordination between DHS I&A partners.