1. What is at issue from your reading of this case?
2. Do you agree or disagree with Google in this case? Explain.
3. What is your reaction or response now to the statement made by a Google spokesperson in 2006? "While removing search results is inconsistent with Google's mission, providing no information (or a heavily degraded user experience that amounts to no information) is more inconsistent with our mission." Is this still Google's position?
4. What ethical principles did Google use and is now using to do business in China with it censorship policy? Has anything changed on Google's part? Explain. What ethical principles are Google's critics in the case using and not accepting Google's presence in China?