Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Which of the following answers correctly states the holding of the Court in Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), Group of answer choices The
Which of the following answers correctly states the holding of the Court in Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), Group of answer choices The initially lawful traffic stop of Caballes became unlawful because without reasonable suspicion of narcotic activity, the use of the canine officer unduly lengthened the traffic stop. The initially lawful traffic stop of Caballes became unlawful, the use of the canine officer, without reasonable suspicion of narcotic activity, violated Cabballes' 4th Amendment rights The use of a well-trained narcotics-detection dog that did not expose non-contraband items, during a brief and lawful traffic stop, does not implicate legitimate interests of privacy, and therefore, does not trigger 4th Amendment protection. The use of a well-trained narcotics-detection dog during a brief and lawful traffic stop, does not implicate legitimate interests of privacy, and therefore, does not trigger 4th Amendment protection, irrespective of whether use of the canine officer exposed lawful as well as unlawful activity
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started