Question: One might suppose that the syntactic distinction between unboxed links and singly boxed links in semantic networks is unnecessary, because singly boxed links are always
One might suppose that the syntactic distinction between unboxed links and singly boxed links in semantic networks is unnecessary, because singly boxed links are always attached to categories an inheritance algorithm could simply assume that an unboxed link attached to a category is intended to apply to all members of that category. Show that this argument is fallacious, giving examples of errors that would arise.
Step by Step Solution
3.28 Rating (169 Votes )
There are 3 Steps involved in it
When categories are reified they can have properties as individual ... View full answer
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Document Format (1 attachment)
21-C-S-A-I (158).docx
120 KBs Word File
