Bart has been a successful Chief Financial Officer for the Wizzo Corporation for 15 years. During his tenure, share value for Wizzo has risen from $12 to $$95. He and the other Wizzo managers have been doing this right - focusing on growing Wizzo's customer base and pursuing reasonable cost reductions. Bart has been rewarded with stock options that now add up to a significant portion of his personal wealth. The latest forecast figures have just been presented to him and it is evident that Wizzo's stock value is going to tumble as soon as this news is made public.

Would it be ethically acceptable (amoral) for Bart to sell off his Wizzo stock before the bad news comes out, or would doing see be unfair or harmful to the other shareholders Bart is supposed to be representing? Answer with the Four-part answer model.

1. State your answer to the question in a single short sentence. Do not use terms like "I believe" or "in my opinion." 2.Give your reason(s)in defence of your answer. A complete reason is a statement or set of statements that together makes your conclusion follow. 3.State an opposing answer and the reason one would appeal to support that answer. 4.Explain what is wrong with the opposing answer (Think of Mary's response to Bill's argument