Consider this familiar scenario $($for me$,$ anyway$)$: executives from another company tout the success of processes like XYZ or products like ABC, triggering a chain reaction within your organization. Suddenly, you're the one tasked with investigating, evaluating, and possibly implementing these newfound approaches. You're in the hot seat $($just as I am$,$ at least... monthly$).$

Now, step into the shoes of an executive in your current or previous workplace or even your dream job company. Imagine being handed the book "Sprint" with a directive to explore its potential application. However, there's a crucial step that's sometimes forgotten: the question of whether we should adopt it at all.

Your task is to embark on a real$-$world exploration. Study the book, explore external resources, seek out company examples, and synthesize your findings into a persuasive, single$-$spaced, typed review. This review should span at least three pages $($excluding title pages and references$)$ and encompass:

Introduction to the Book and Process: Set the stage by introducing the book "Sprint" and the design thinking and innovation sprint process it presents.

Position and Statement on Adoption: Present your clear stance on whether your company should or shouldn't adopt the process. Articulate your opinion on its potential applicability.

Arguments Supporting Your Position $($Pro$)$: Build a compelling case in favor of your stance. Provide evidence, insights from the book, and external resources that strengthen your position.

Exploring the Contrary Viewpoint: Offer an objective examination of the opposite perspective $$ the reasons for not adopting the process. Counterbalance your arguments with potential drawbacks or limitations$.$

Conclusion and Persuasive Summation: Craft a powerful conclusion that reinforces your position, emphasizing why it's the most prudent course of action.

Drawing inspiration from position articles and book reviews, ensure your review is an exercise in persuasion, offering insights beyond mere notes or summaries. Remember the boss$-$to$-$boss tone as you craft your narrative, maintaining proper writing etiquette $($don$\text{'}$t write it like a paper to a professor please$).$