Question
DriveTech plc is engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing high-performance racing cars. It wishes to build a racetrack upon which it can test
DriveTech plc is engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing high-performance racing cars. It wishes to build a racetrack upon which it can test its prototype models, and to that end, it creates a subsidiary company called Track Build Ltd. A suitable piece of land on which to build the testing track is located and Track Build purchases it using capital borrowed from Drive Tech. However, shortly thereafter, the directors of Track Build (all of whom are also directors of Drive Tech) discover that the land does not have planning permission and so TrackBuild agrees to sell the land to BuildCorp Ltd, a local construction company. However, several days later, a member of the local council indicates to the directors of Track Build that, should it apply for planning permission, it would certainly be granted. Accordingly, before sale of the land to BuildCorp is completed, Track Build transfers ownership of the land to DriveTech, and argues that the contract with BuildCorp is no longer valid as it no longer owns the land. TrackBuild successfully applies for planning permission.
DriveTech decides that it wishes to expand into the consumer car market and, to this end, it created another subsidiary called GearShift Ltd. The articles of GearShift provide that only directors nominated by DriveTech may sit on its board and, accordingly, all the directors of GearShift are either persons nominated by DriveTech, or are actually also directors of DriveTech. GearShift engages in research and development on a new car and this is funded exclusively by issuing shares that are purchased by DriveTech (with the result that GearShift becomes a wholly owned subsidiary). However, more capital is required, but the directors of
DriveTech refuse to provide GearShift with any more capital and instead order the board of GearShift to cut back on its research and development. Accordingly, the directors of GearShift agree to cut back on research into the car's safety features. GearShift completes designing a new car and it is manufactured and sold to the public. However, the car turns out to be unsafe due to a defect in the car's brakes and numerous accidents occur. Those who suffered injury and loss due to the defective cars initiate proceedings against GearShift but, by this time, GearShift has entered insolvent liquidation, and has insufficient funds to meet any liability.
Advise the parties above of any potential liability they might face. (20mks)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started