In Miller v$.$ California $(1973)$ the Supreme Court ruled that there is no broad First Amendment protection for pornography and that instead, states could censor pornographic work if all of the following conditions are satisfied except:

Select an answer and submit. For keyboard navigation, use the up$/$down arrow keys to select an answer.

a The average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interests.

The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific merit.

Your answer

The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct or excretory functions.

d The work portrays particular sex acts in ways that are especially unrealistic.