Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Matching: Answers may only be used one time, and each correct response is worth 2 points. Michael Randall and Molly Moskowitz (also known as the

image text in transcribed

Matching: Answers may only be used one time, and each correct response is worth 2 points. Michael Randall and Molly Moskowitz (also known as the couple) The couple's $5,000 deposit The lawsuit was filed and included "more than 1,000 other Cescaphe clients potentially affected by the company's actions". "The agreement between the couple and Cescaphe clearly states the $5,000 deposit would 'guarantee' the date they wanted. Of course that agreement also clearly states the the $5,000 deposit was non-refundable." Force Majeure language was included in the contract. The couple paid a $5,000 deposit to secure June 12, 2020 as the date of their outdoor wedding with Cescaphe at Water Works. Cescaphe accepted this deposit and agreed to host this event at Water Works on June 12,2020. Through their attorney, the couple asked for the return of their $5,000. If we assume that Molly Moskowitz and Michael Randall had the ability to be bound by a contract, they would have met the legal requirement of Cescaphe, the wedding and special-events company The terms of the contract were not fulfilled due to the pandemic and the government- mandated shutdown of business - making this a issue. Matching: Answers may only be used one time, and each correct response is worth 2 points. Michael Randall and Molly Moskowitz (also known as the couple) The couple's $5,000 deposit The lawsuit was filed and included "more than 1,000 other Cescaphe clients potentially affected by the company's actions". "The agreement between the couple and Cescaphe clearly states the $5,000 deposit would 'guarantee' the date they wanted. Of course that agreement also clearly states the the $5,000 deposit was non-refundable." Force Majeure language was included in the contract. The couple paid a $5,000 deposit to secure June 12, 2020 as the date of their outdoor wedding with Cescaphe at Water Works. Cescaphe accepted this deposit and agreed to host this event at Water Works on June 12,2020. Through their attorney, the couple asked for the return of their $5,000. If we assume that Molly Moskowitz and Michael Randall had the ability to be bound by a contract, they would have met the legal requirement of Cescaphe, the wedding and special-events company The terms of the contract were not fulfilled due to the pandemic and the government- mandated shutdown of business - making this a issue

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Making Accountability Work Dilemmas For Evaluation And For Audit

Authors: Marie-Louise Bemelmans-Videc, Jeremy Lonsdale, Burt Perrin

1st Edition

1412865557, 978-1412865555

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

what is the most common cause of preterm birth in twin pregnancies?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Which diagnostic test is most commonly used to confirm PROM?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

What is the hallmark clinical feature of a molar pregnancy?

Answered: 1 week ago