All Matches
Solution Library
Expert Answer
Textbooks
Search Textbook questions, tutors and Books
Oops, something went wrong!
Change your search query and then try again
Toggle navigation
FREE Trial
S
Books
FREE
Tutors
Study Help
Expert Questions
Accounting
General Management
Mathematics
Finance
Organizational Behaviour
Law
Physics
Operating System
Management Leadership
Sociology
Programming
Marketing
Database
Computer Network
Economics
Textbooks Solutions
Accounting
Managerial Accounting
Management Leadership
Cost Accounting
Statistics
Business Law
Corporate Finance
Finance
Economics
Auditing
Hire a Tutor
AI Study Help
New
Search
Search
Sign In
Register
study help
business
measures integrals and martingales
Questions and Answers of
Measures Integrals And Martingales
Let \(u: \mathbb{R} ightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be measurable. Which of the following functions are measurable:\(u(x-2)\)\(e^{u(x)}\),\(\sin (u(x)+8)\),\(u^{\prime \prime}(x)\),\(\operatorname{sgn} u(x-7)
Check the following. In the proof of the factorization lemma (Lemma 8.14 ) we cannot, in general, replace \(\liminf _{n} w_{n}\) by \(\lim _{n} w_{n}\).[ find a sequence \(\left(w_{n}ight)_{n}\) and
One can show that there are non-Borel measurable sets \(A \subset \mathbb{R}\), see Appendix \(\mathrm{G}\). Taking this fact for granted, show that measurability of \(|u|\) does not, in general,
Show that every increasing function \(u: \mathbb{R} ightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is \(\mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R}) / \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R})\)-measurable. Under which additional condition(s) do we have
Let \(\mathscr{A}=\sigma(\mathscr{G})\) be a \(\sigma\)-algebra on \(X\), where \(\mathscr{G}=\left\{G_{i}: i \in \mathbb{N}ight\}\) is a countable generator. Let \(g:=\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} 2^{-i}
Show that any left- or right-continuous function \(u: \mathbb{R} ightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is Borel measurable.
Show that every linear map \(f: \mathbb{R}^{n} ightarrow \mathbb{R}^{m}\) is \(\mathscr{B}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}ight) / \mathscr{B}\left(\mathbb{R}^{m}ight)\)-measurable. Provide an example in which
Complete the proof of Properties 9.8.Data from properties 9.8 (of the integral) Let u, v M(). Then (1) [1 d= (4) (audu-adp VAEA; Va>0 (iii) [(u + v) d = [ud + + [vd Sud < [vd (iv) u
Let \(f: X ightarrow \mathbb{R}\) be a positive simple function of the form \(f(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{m} \xi_{n} \mathbb{1}_{A_{n}}(x), \xi_{n} \geqslant 0\), \(A_{n} \in \mathscr{A}\) - but not necessarily
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space and \(A_{1}, \ldots, A_{N} \in \mathscr{A}\) such that \(\mu\left(A_{n}ight)
Find an example showing that an 'increasing sequence of functions' is, in general, different from a 'sequence of increasing functions'.
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space. Show the following variant of Theorem 9.6. If \(u_{n} \geqslant 0\) are measurable functions such that for some \(u\) we have\[\exists K \in
Complete the proof of Corollary 9.9 and show that (9.6) is actually equivalent to (9.5) in Beppo Levi's theorem.Data from corollary 9.9Data from theorem 9.6 18 Let (Un)neNCM(A). Then 1 un is
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space and \(u \in \mathcal{M}^{+}(\mathscr{A})\). Show that \(A \mapsto \int \mathbb{1}_{A} u d \mu, A \in \mathscr{A}\), is a measure.
Prove that every function \(u: \mathbb{N} ightarrow \mathbb{R}\) on \((\mathbb{N}, \mathscr{P}(\mathbb{N}))\) is measurable.
Let \((X, \mathscr{A})\) be a measurable space and \(\left(\mu_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\) be a sequence of measures thereon. Set, as in Example 9.10(ii), \(\mu=\sum_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \mu_{n}\).
Reverse Fatou lemma. Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space and \(\left(u_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathcal{M}^{+}(\mathscr{A})\). If \(u_{n} \leqslant u\) for all \(n \in
Let \(\left(A_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathscr{A}\) be a sequence of disjoint sets such that \(\bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} A_{n}=X\). Show that for every \(u \in
Kernels. Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space. A map \(N: X \times \mathscr{A} ightarrow[0, \infty]\) is called a kernel if\[\begin{array}{rlrl}A & \mapsto N(x, A) & & \text { is a
(Continuation of Problem 6.3) Consider on \(\mathbb{R}\) the \(\sigma\)-algebra \(\Sigma\) of all Borel sets which are symmetric w.r.t. the origin. Set \(A^{+}:=A \cap[0, \infty), A^{-}:=(-\infty,
Prove Remark 10.5, i.e. prove the linearity of the integral.Data from remark 10.5 If u(x) = v(x) is defined in R for all x EX-i.e. if we can exclude '-' - then Theorem 10.4(i), (ii) just say that the
Let \((\Omega, \mathscr{A}, \mathbb{P})\) be a probability space. Find a counterexample to the claim that every \(\mathbb{P}\)-integrable function \(u \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mathbb{P})\) is bounded.[
Prove Lemma 10.8.Data from lemma 10.8 On the measure space (X, A,p) let us M(A). The set function + 1 ud = [1 sudu, AE A V: A+ is a measure on (X, A). It is called the measure with density (function)
Let \(\left(A_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathscr{A}\) be a sequence of mutually disjoint sets. Show that\[u \mathbb{1}_{\cup_{n} A_{n}} \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) \Longleftrightarrow u
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space and \(u \in \mathcal{M}(\mathscr{A})\). Show that\[u \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) \Longleftrightarrow \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} 2^{n} \mu\left\{2^{n}
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a finite measure space. Show that(i) \(u \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu) \Longleftrightarrow u \in \mathcal{M}(\mathscr{A})\) and \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \mu\{|u| \geqslant n\}
Generalized Fatou lemma. Assume that \(\left(u_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu)\). Prove the following.(i) If \(u_{n} \geqslant v\) for all \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) and some \(v
Independence (2). Let \((\Omega, \mathscr{A}, P)\) be a probability space and assume that the \(\sigma\)-algebras \(\mathscr{B}, \mathscr{C} \subset \mathscr{A}\) are independent (see Problem 5.11).
Integrating complex functions. Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space. For a complex number \(z=x+i y \in \mathbb{C}\) we write \(x=\operatorname{Re} z\) and \(y=\operatorname{Im} z\) for
True or false: if \(f \in \mathcal{L}^{1}\) we can change \(f\) on a set \(N\) of measure zero (e.g. by\[\tilde{f}(x):= \begin{cases}f(x) & \text { if } x otin N \\ \beta & \text { if } x \in
Every countable set is a \(\lambda^{1}\)-null set. Use the Cantor ternary set \(C\) (see Problem 7.12) to illustrate that the converse is not true. What happens if we change \(\lambda^{1}\) to
Prove the following variants of the Markov inequality Proposition 11.5 . For all \(\alpha, c>0\) and whenever the expressions involved make sense/are finite,(i) \(\mu\{|u|>c\} \leqslant
Show that \(\int|u|^{p} d \mu
Completion (3). Let \((X, \overline{\mathscr{A}}, \bar{\mu})\) be the completion of \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\), see Problems 4.15 , and 6.4.(i) Show that for every \(f^{*} \in
Completion (4). Inner measure and outer measure. Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a finite measure space. Define for every \(E \subset X\) the outer resp. inner measure\[\begin{aligned}&
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space and assume that \(u \in \mathcal{M}(\mathscr{A})\) and \(u=w\) almost everywhere w.r.t. \(\mu\). When can we say that \(w \in
'a.e.' is a tricky business. When working with 'a.e.' properties one has to be extremely careful. For example, the assertions ' \(u\) is continuous a.e.' and ' \(u\) is a.e. equal to an (everywhere)
Let \(\mu\) be a \(\sigma\)-finite measure on the measurable space \((X, \mathscr{A})\). Show that there exists a finite measure \(P\) on \((X, \mathscr{A})\) such that
Construct an example showing that for \(u, w \in \mathcal{M}^{+}(\mathscr{B})\) the equality \(\int_{B} u d \mu=\int_{B} w d \mu\) for all \(B \in \mathscr{B}\) does not necessarily imply that
Show the following extension of Corollary 11.7 . Let \(\mathscr{C} \subset \mathscr{P}(X)\) be a \(\cap\)-stable generator of \(\mathscr{A}\) which contains a sequence \(C_{n} \uparrow X\) such that
Egorov's theorem. Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a finite measure space and \(f_{n}: X ightarrow \mathbb{R}, n \in \mathbb{N}\), a sequence of measurable functions. Prove the following
Adapt the proof of Theorem 12.2 to show that any sequence (un)n∈N⊂M(A)(un)n∈N⊂M(A) with limn→∞un(x)=u(x)limn→∞un(x)=u(x) and |un|⩽g|un|⩽g for some g⩾0g⩾0 with
Give an alternative proof of Theorem 12.2 (ii) using the generalized Fatou theorem from Problem 10.7.Data from theorem 12.2Data from problem 10.7 (Lebesgue; dominated convergence) Let (X, A, u) be a
Prove the following result of W.H. Young [60]; among statisticians it is also known as Pratt's lemma, see J. W. Pratt [38].Theorem (Young; Pratt). Let (fk)k,(gk)k(fk)k,(gk)k and (Gk)k(Gk)k be
Let (un)n∈N(un)n∈N be a sequence of integrable functions on (X,A,μ)(X,A,μ). Show that, if ∑∞n=1∫|un|dμ∞∑n=1∞∫|un|dμ∞, the series ∑∞n=1un∑n=1∞un converges a.e. to a
Let \(\left(u_{n}\right)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\) be a sequence of positive integrable functions on a measure space \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\). Assume that the sequence decreases to \(0: u_{1} \geqslant
Find a sequence of integrable functions (un)n∈N(un)n∈N with un(x)→u(x)un(x)→u(x) for all xx and an integrable function uu but such that
Let \(\mu\) be a finite measure on \(([0, \infty), \mathscr{B}[0, \infty))\). Find the limit \(\lim _{r\rightarrow \infty} \int_{[0, \infty)} e^{-r x} \mu(d x)\).
Let \(\lambda\) denote Lebesgue measure on \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\).(i) Let \(u \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda)\) and \(K \subset \mathbb{R}^{n}\) be a compact (i.e. closed and bounded) set. Show that \(\lim
Let \(\lambda\) denote Lebesgue measure on \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) and \(u \in \mathcal{L}^{1}(\lambda)\).(i) For every \(\epsilon>0\) there is a set \(B \in \mathscr{B}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}ight),
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space and \(\left(u_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathcal{L}^{1}(\mu)\) be a uniformly convergent sequence.(i) If \(\mu(X)
Consider the following variation of Cantor's set: fix \(r \in(0,1)\) and delete from \(I_{0}=[0,1]\) the open interval \(\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4} r, \frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{4} ight)\). This defines
Let \(A, B, C \subset X\). The symmetric difference of \(A\) and \(B\) is \(A \triangle B:=(A \backslash B) \cup(B \backslash A)\). Verify that\[(A \cup B \cup C) \backslash(A \cap B \cap C)=(A
Show that the following sets have the same cardinality as \(\mathbb{N}:\{m \in \mathbb{N}: m\) is odd \(\}, \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{Z}\), \(\mathbb{Q}^{m}(m \in \mathbb{N}), \bigcup_{m \in
Use Theorem 2.7 to show that \(\# \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}=\# \mathbb{N}\).[ \(\# \mathbb{N}=\# \mathbb{N} \times\{1\}\) and \(\mathbb{N} \times\{1\} \subset \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N}\).
Show that if \(E \subset F\) we have \(\# E \leqslant \# F\). In particular, subsets of countable sets are again countable.
Let \(\mathscr{F}:=\{F \subset \mathbb{N}: \# F
Show - not using Theorem 2.10 - that \(\# \mathscr{P}(\mathbb{N})>\# \mathbb{N}\). Conclude that there are more than countably many maps \(f: \mathbb{N} ightarrow \mathbb{N}\).[ use the diagonal
If \(A \subset \mathbb{N}\) we can identify the indicator function \(\mathbb{1}_{A}: \mathbb{N} ightarrow\{0,1\}\) with the 0 -1-sequence \(\left(\mathbb{1}_{A}(i)ight)_{i \in \mathbb{N}}\), i.e.
Show that for \(A_{n}^{0}, A_{n}^{1} \subset X, n \in \mathbb{N}\), we have\[\bigcup_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\left(A_{n}^{0} \cap A_{n}^{1}ight)=\bigcap_{i=(i(k))_{k \in \mathbb{N}}
Let \(\mathscr{A}\) be a \(\sigma\)-algebra. Show that(i). if \(A_{1}, A_{2}, \ldots, A_{N} \in \mathscr{A}\), then \(A_{1} \cap A_{2} \cap \cdots \cap A_{N} \in \mathscr{A}\);(ii). \(A \in
Prove the assertions made in Example 3.3 (iv), (vi) and (vii). [ use (2.6) for (vii).]Data from example 3.3Equation 2.6 (i) P(X) is a o-algebra (the maximal o-algebra in X). (ii) {0, X) is a
Let \(X=\mathbb{R}\). Find the \(\sigma\)-algebra generated by the singletons \(\{\{x\}: x \in \mathbb{R}\}\).
Verify the assertions made in Remark 3.5 .Data from remark 3.5 Remark 3.5 (i) If is a o-algebra, then 9 = o(9). (ii) For ACX we have o({4})= {0, A, A, X}. (iii) If FCICA, then o(F) Co (9) Co(A) 3.5)
Let \(X=[0,1]\). Find the \(\sigma\)-algebra generated by the sets(i). \(\left(0, \frac{1}{2}ight)\);(ii). \(\left[0, \frac{1}{4}ight),\left(\frac{3}{4}, 1ight]\);(iii). \(\left[0,
Let \((X, \mathscr{A})\) be a measurable space. Show that there cannot be a \(\sigma\)-algebra \(\mathscr{A}\) which contains countably infinitely many sets.[recall that \(A \in \mathscr{A}\) is an
Let \((X, \mathscr{A})\) be a measurable space and \(\left(\mathscr{A}_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\) be a strictly increasing sequence of \(\sigma\)-algebras, i.e. \(\mathscr{A}_{n} \subsetneq
Verify the properties \(\left(\mathscr{O}_{1}ight)\)-( \(\left.\mathscr{O}_{3}ight)\) for open sets in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\). Is \(\mathscr{O}\) a \(\sigma\)-algebra?
Denote by \(B_{r}(x)\) an open ball in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) with centre \(x\) and radius \(r\). Show that the Borel sets \(\mathscr{B}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}ight)\) are generated by all open balls
Let \(\mathscr{O}\) be the collection of open sets (topology) in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) and let \(A \subset \mathbb{R}^{n}\) be an arbitrary subset. We can introduce a topology \(\mathscr{O}_{A}\) on
Monotone classes (1). A family \(\mathscr{M} \subset \mathscr{P}(X)\) which contains \(X\) and is stable under countable unions of increasing sets and countable intersections of decreasing sets.is
Let \(X\) be an arbitrary set and \(\mathscr{F} \subset \mathscr{P}(X)\). Show that\[\sigma(\mathscr{F})=\bigcup\{\sigma(\mathscr{C}): \mathscr{C} \subset \mathscr{F} \text { countable sub-family
Extend Proposition 4.3(i)4.3(i), (iv) and (v) to finitely many sets A1,A2,…,AN∈AA1,A2,…,AN∈A.Data from proposition 4.3 Let (X, A,) be a measure space and A, B, An, BnA, nN. Then (1) ANB=0
Is the set function \(\gamma\) of Example 4.5 (ii) still a measure on the measurable space \((\mathbb{R}, \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R}))\) ? Is it still a measure on the measurable space \((\mathbb{Q},
Let \(X=\mathbb{R}\). For which \(\sigma\)-algebras are the following set functions measures:(i) \(\quad \mu(A)= \begin{cases}0, & \text { if } A=\emptyset \\ 1, & \text { if } A eq
Find an example showing that the finiteness condition in Proposition 4.3 (vii) or Lemma 4.9 is essential.[ use Lebesgue measure or the counting measure on infinite tails \([k, \infty) \downarrow
Find a measure \(\mu\) on \((\mathbb{R}, \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R}))\) which is \(\sigma\)-finite but assigns to every interval \([a, b)\) with \(b-a>2\) finite mass.
Let \((X, \mathscr{A})\) be a measurable space and assume that \(\mu: \mathscr{A} ightarrow[0, \infty]\) finitely additive and \(\sigma\)-subadditive. Show that \(\mu\) is \(\sigma\)-additive.
Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space and \(F \in \mathscr{A}\). Show that \(\mathscr{A} i A \mapsto \mu(A \cap F)\) defines a measure.
Let \((\Omega, \mathscr{A}, \mathbb{P})\) be a probability space and \(\left(A_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathscr{A}\) a sequence of sets with \(\mathbb{P}\left(A_{n}ight)=1\) for all \(n
Null sets. Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a measure space. A set \(N \in \mathscr{A}\) is called a null set or \(\mu\)-null set if \(\mu(N)=0\). We write \(\mathscr{N}_{\mu}\) for the family of all
Let \(\lambda\) be one-dimensional Lebesgue measure.(i). Show that for all \(x \in \mathbb{R}\) the set \(\{x\}\) is a Borel set with \(\lambda\{x\}=0\).[ consider the intervals \([x-1 / k, x+1 / k),
Determine all null sets of the measure \(\delta_{a}+\delta_{b}, a, b \in \mathbb{R}\), on \((\mathbb{R}, \mathscr{B}(\mathbb{R}))\).
Verify the claims made in Remark 5.2Data from remark 5.2 As for o-algebras, see Properties 3.2, one sees that 0 and that finite disjoint unions are again in 2: D, E = D, DnE=0 DUE 9. Of course,
The following exercise shows that Dynkin systems and \(\sigma\)-algebras are, in general, different. Let \(X=\{1,2,3, \ldots, 4 k-1,4 k\}\) for some \(k \in \mathbb{N}\). Then \(\mathscr{D}=\{A
Let \(\mathscr{D}\) be a Dynkin system. Show that for all \(A, B \in \mathscr{D}\) with \(A \subset B\) the difference \(B \backslash A \in \mathscr{D}\). [ use \(R \backslash Q=\left((R \cap Q)
Let \(\mathscr{A}\) be a \(\sigma\)-algebra, \(\mathscr{D}\) be a Dynkin system and \(\mathscr{G} \subset \mathscr{H} \subset \mathscr{P}(X)\) two collections of subsets of \(X\). Show that(i)
Let \(A, B \subset X\). Compare \(\delta(\{A, B\})\) and \(\sigma(\{A, B\})\). When are they equal?
Show that Theorem 5.7 is still valid, if \(\left(G_{n}ight)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \subset \mathscr{G}\) is not an increasing sequence but any countable family of sets such that\[\text { (1) } \bigcup_{n
Show that the half-open intervals \(\mathscr{J}\) in \(\mathbb{R}^{n}\) are stable under finite intersections. [ check that \(\left.\mathrm{X}_{i=1}^{n}\left[a_{i}, b_{i}ight) \cap
Dilations. Mimic the proof of Theorem 5.8 (i) and show that \(t \cdot B:=\{t b: b \in B\}\) is a Borel set for all \(B \in \mathscr{B}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}ight)\) and \(t>0\).
Invariant measures. Let \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) be a finite measure space where \(\mathscr{A}=\sigma(\mathscr{G})\) for some \(\cap\)-stable generator \(\mathscr{G}\). Assume that \(\theta: X
Independence (1). Let \((\Omega, \mathscr{A}, \mathbb{P})\) be a probability space and let \(\mathscr{B}, \mathscr{C} \subset \mathscr{A}\) be two sub- \(\sigma\) algebras of \(\mathscr{A}\). We call
Approximation of \(\sigma\)-algebras. Let \(\mathscr{G}\) be a Boolean algebra in \(X\), i.e. a family of sets such that \(X \in \mathscr{G}\) and \(\mathscr{G}\) is stable under the formation of
Let \(\mu^{*}\) be an outer measure on \(X\), and let \(A_{1}, A_{2}, \ldots\) be a sequence of mutually disjoint \(\mu^{*}\)-measurable sets, i.e. \(A_{i} \in \mathcal{A}^{*}, i \in \mathbb{N}\).
Consider on \(\mathbb{R}\) the family \(\Sigma\) of all Borel sets which are symmetric w.r.t. the origin. Show that \(\Sigma\) is a \(\sigma\)-algebra. Is it possible to extend a pre-measure \(\mu\)
Completion (2). Recall from Problem 9.14 that a measure space \((X, \mathscr{A}, \mu)\) is complete if every subset of a \(\mu\)-null set is a \(\mu\)-null set (thus, in particular, measurable). Let
The steps below show that the family \(\epsilon_{\lambda}(t):=e^{-\lambda t}, \lambda, t>0\), is determining for \(([0, \infty), \mathscr{B}[0, \infty))\).(i) Weierstraß' approximation theorem
Show that we even get ' \(=\) ' in the estimate denoted by (ii) in Lemma 18.9.Data from lemma 18.9 Lemma 18.9 Let (X, d) be a metric space, the open sets, the closed sets and P = P(X) the power set.
Let \(X=\mathbb{R}^{n}\) (or a separable metric space). Let \(B\) be a Borel set or, more generally, an \(\overline{\mathcal{H}}^{\phi}\)-measurable set, such that \(\mathcal{H}(B)[Instructions. Open
Showing 300 - 400
of 423
1
2
3
4
5